This Essay explores the ethical issues that arise for plaintiffs’ lawyers involved in nonclass aggregate settlements. Rule 1.8(g) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct requires that each client in an aggregate settlement must give their informed consent to the settlement amount allocated to them by their lawyer. This Essay argues that lawyers’ fees in some aggregate settlements are of such a magnitude that they simply overwhelm any proclivity of lawyers to adhere to the rule. The Essay uses the Phillips Petroleum litigation as an example of the more egregious results of perverse incentives created by fees of that magnitude.
To access the full article, please click on the 'Download' link, above.