blank
Skip navigation links
Home
About Us
Current Articles
Archived Articles
Symposia
Alumni
Submissions
Article Download PDF Print Version
Client Representation vs. Case Administration: The ALI Looks at Legal Ethics Issues in Aggregate Settlements
By Thomas D. Morgan
This Essay discusses the approach the American Law Institute’s Principles of the Law of Aggregate Litigation take to the issue of aggregate settlements.  Contrary to Rule 1.8(g) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, and contrary to most of the decided cases, the Principles would permit resolution of multiple claims by less than a unanimous vote of the claimants.  This Essay acknowledges practical concerns that underlie the proposal and applauds the Reporters’ effort to craft a new approach.  Ultimately, however, it concludes that the proposal inadequately protects values embodied in the cases and in ABA Model Rule 1.8(g).

To access the full article, please click on the 'Download' link, above.

About This Content
 
Keywords: Morgan, Legal Ethics, Conflict of Interest, Aggregate Settlement, Model Rule 1.8
Content Type: Article
Media Type: Print
Author: Thomas D. Morgan
Publish Date: February 2011
| | 1919 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite M250, Washington, DC 20006 Phone: 202.994.4610 Fax: 202.994.4609